Today we returned to the bank of the pond where we (re)encountered the geese. We watch them swim, a passive observation until they begin to approach the shore, and once again they make it known that our presence is disruptive. They advance toward us and once again we retreat to the pathway. How might we trouble animal-child relations by returning to the pond? How do our responses shift when the geese communicate their desire for us to move on? How does encountering geese in a way where we must retreat disrupt logics of freedom & exploration in childhood? Here, a pedagogical insistence on returning (and retreating) is working to disrupt the anthropocentric logics of control, of unfettered access to land, to water, and to “nature”.
You may also like
This blog will document a research project taking place over the spring and summer months in 2019 at The Glenridge Quarry Naturalization […]
This post is reproduced from the Common Worlds Research Collective’s series of microblogs. The original post can be found here: http://commonworlds.net/how-might-attuning-to-withness-marks-reconfigure-our-non-innocent-encounters-with-place/ How […]
We often walk to the clay-bottomed, borrow pit pond at the northern side of the Quarry site. There is a wooden boardwalk […]
This post is reproduced from the Common Worlds Research Collective’s series of microblogs. The original post can be found here: https://commonworlds.net/how-might-storying-witness-marks-guide-our-relations-with-place/ How […]